Re: [PATCH v2 12/20] dt-bindings: reset: npcm: Add support for NPCM8XX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16/06/2022 06:24, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2022 at 20:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 13/06/2022 02:25, Tomer Maimon wrote:
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your clarification.
>>>
>>> We can remove the dt-binding file and use numbers in the DTS,
>>> appreciate if you can answer few additional questions:
>>> 1. Do you suggest adding all NPCM reset values to the NPCM reset
>>> document or the reset values should describe in the module
>>> documentation that uses it?
>>
>> What is "NPCM reset document"? Are these reset values anyhow different
>> than interrupts or pins?
> No, they represent the same values.


We do not document in the bindings actual pin or interrupt numbers...

>>
>>> 2. Some of the NPCM7XX document modules describe the reset value they
>>> use from the dt-binding for example:
>>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/nuvoton%2Cnpcm750-adc.yaml#L61
>>
>> This is NPCM750
>>
>>> If we remove the NPCM8XX dt-binding file should we describe the
>>> NPCM8XX values in the NPCM-ADC document file?
>>
>> What is NPCM-ADC document file? What do you want to describe there?
>> Again - how is it different than interrupts?
> It is not different from the interrupts.
> I will remove the dt-binding reset include file, the reset property
> will use numbers and not macro's.

I have no clue what are you referring now... This is NPCM8xx and it has
no binding header with reset values. What to remove then?


Best regards,
Krzysztof



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux