On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 04:01:13PM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> Arnd,
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 02:38:39PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 23 September 2014 14:15:30 Antoine Tenart wrote:
> > > +Optional properties:
> > > +- port-id: should be '0','1' or '2'.
> > > +- phy-addr: MDIO address of the PHY.
> > > +- local-mac-address: see ethernet.txt file in the same directory.
> > > +
> > >
> >
> > I believe new bindings should not use "phy-addr" properties, but
> > instead use a phy-handle property pointing to a phy device instead.
>
So I had a look on other Ethernet bindings. Would you agree with
something like the following?
eth0: ethernet@f7b90000 {
...
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
phy-handle = <ðphy0>;
ethphy0: ethernet-phy@0 {
reg = <0>;
};
};
Antoine
--
Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
