Re: [PATCH 1/3] dts: socfpga: Change Mercury+ AA1 devicetree to header

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30/05/2022 15:08, Paweł Anikiel wrote:
> The Mercury+ AA1 is not a standalone board, rather it's a module
> with an Arria 10 SoC and some peripherals on it. Remove everything that
> is not strictly related to the module.

Subject has several issues:
1. Use prefix matching subsystem (git log --oneline)
2. You are not changing here anything to header. Header files have
different format and end with .h. This is a DTSI file.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Paweł Anikiel <pan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thank you for your patch. There is something to discuss/improve.

> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile                    |  1 -
>  ...1.dts => socfpga_arria10_mercury_aa1.dtsi} | 68 ++++---------------
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>  rename arch/arm/boot/dts/{socfpga_arria10_mercury_aa1.dts => socfpga_arria10_mercury_aa1.dtsi} (58%)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> index edfbedaa6168..023c8b4ba45c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> @@ -1146,7 +1146,6 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_S5PV210) += \
>  	s5pv210-torbreck.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_INTEL_SOCFPGA) += \
>  	socfpga_arria5_socdk.dtb \
> -	socfpga_arria10_mercury_aa1.dtb \
>  	socfpga_arria10_socdk_nand.dtb \
>  	socfpga_arria10_socdk_qspi.dtb \
>  	socfpga_arria10_socdk_sdmmc.dtb \
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_arria10_mercury_aa1.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_arria10_mercury_aa1.dtsi
> similarity index 58%
> rename from arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_arria10_mercury_aa1.dts
> rename to arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_arria10_mercury_aa1.dtsi
> index a75c059b6727..fee1fc39bb2b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_arria10_mercury_aa1.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_arria10_mercury_aa1.dtsi
> @@ -1,57 +1,38 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> -/dts-v1/;
> -
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2022 Google LLC
> + */

How is this related to the patch?

>  #include "socfpga_arria10.dtsi"
>  
>  / {
> -
> -	model = "Enclustra Mercury AA1";
> -	compatible = "enclustra,mercury-aa1", "altr,socfpga-arria10", "altr,socfpga";
> -
>  	aliases {
>  		ethernet0 = &gmac0;
>  		serial1 = &uart1;
> -		i2c0 = &i2c0;
> -		i2c1 = &i2c1;
> -	};
> -
> -	memory@0 {
> -		name = "memory";
> -		device_type = "memory";
> -		reg = <0x0 0x80000000>; /* 2GB */
>  	};
>  
>  	chosen {
>  		stdout-path = "serial1:115200n8";
>  	};
> -};
>  
> -&eccmgr {
> -	sdmmca-ecc@ff8c2c00 {
> -		compatible = "altr,socfpga-sdmmc-ecc";
> -		reg = <0xff8c2c00 0x400>;
> -		altr,ecc-parent = <&mmc>;
> -		interrupts = <15 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> -			     <47 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> -			     <16 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> -			     <48 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +	memory@0 {
> +		name = "memory";
> +		device_type = "memory";
> +		reg = <0x0 0x80000000>; /* 2GB */
>  	};
>  };
>  
>  &gmac0 {
>  	phy-mode = "rgmii";
> -	phy-addr = <0xffffffff>; /* probe for phy addr */
> +	phy-handle = <&phy3>;
>  
>  	max-frame-size = <3800>;
> -	status = "okay";
> -
> -	phy-handle = <&phy3>;
>  
>  	mdio {
>  		#address-cells = <1>;
>  		#size-cells = <0>;
>  		compatible = "snps,dwmac-mdio";
>  		phy3: ethernet-phy@3 {
> +			reg = <3>;
>  			txd0-skew-ps = <0>; /* -420ps */
>  			txd1-skew-ps = <0>; /* -420ps */
>  			txd2-skew-ps = <0>; /* -420ps */
> @@ -64,35 +45,23 @@ phy3: ethernet-phy@3 {
>  			txc-skew-ps = <1860>; /* 960ps */
>  			rxdv-skew-ps = <420>; /* 0ps */
>  			rxc-skew-ps = <1680>; /* 780ps */
> -			reg = <3>;

This and few other changes (like memory) are not related to the commit.
Do not mix different cleanups together.

>  		};
>  	};
>  };
>  
> -&gpio0 {
> -	status = "okay";
> -};
> -
> -&gpio1 {
> -	status = "okay";
> -};
> -
> -&gpio2 {
> -	status = "okay";
> -};

Why removing all these? Aren't they available on the SoM? The same
question applies to several other pieces, for example UART and USB -
aren't these part of SoM?

> -
>  &i2c1 {
> -	status = "okay";
> +	atsha204a: atsha204a@64 {

How is this change related at all to what you described in commit? There
was no atsha204a before.

> +		compatible = "atmel,atsha204a";
> +		reg = <0x64>;
> +	};
> +
>  	isl12022: isl12022@6f {
> -		status = "okay";
>  		compatible = "isil,isl12022";
>  		reg = <0x6f>;
>  	};
>  };
>  

Best regards,
Krzysztof



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux