On Wed, 2022-05-18 at 12:04 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > Add properties "mediatek,infracfg" and "mediatek,pericfg" to let the > mtk_iommu driver retrieve phandles to the infracfg and pericfg > syscon(s) > instead of performing a per-soc compatible lookup. > > Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno < > angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/iommu/mediatek,iommu.yaml | 8 > ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/mediatek,iommu.yaml > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/mediatek,iommu.yaml > index 2ae3bbad7f1a..c4af41947593 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/mediatek,iommu.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/mediatek,iommu.yaml > @@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ properties: > items: > - const: bclk > > + mediatek,infracfg: > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle > + description: The phandle to the mediatek infracfg syscon > + Just curious, why not put this "mediatek,infracfg" and its required segment[6/7] into one patch? > mediatek,larbs: > $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array > minItems: 1 > @@ -112,6 +116,10 @@ properties: > Refer to bindings/memory-controllers/mediatek,smi-larb.yaml. > It must sort > according to the local arbiter index, like larb0, larb1, > larb2... > > + mediatek,pericfg: > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle > + description: The phandle to the mediatek pericfg syscon > + > '#iommu-cells': > const: 1 > description: |
