On Thu, 19 May 2022 09:51:28 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > I don't think there's a best known practice, you'll have to exercise > > your judgment. Taking a look at a random example of MTK_PDMA_INT_STATUS. > > Looks like that one is already assigned to eth->tx_int_status_reg. > > Maybe that can be generalized? Personally I'd forgo the macros > > completely and just use eth->soc->register_name in the code. > > I personally think the code is easier to read if we use macros in this case. > Let's consider MTK_LRO_CTRL_DW1_CFG(), it depends on the particular soc based > on the register map and even on the ring index. I guess the best trade-off we > can get is to explicitly pass eth to the macros as parameter when needed. Yeah, do you, I was just sharing what my knee jerk direction would be. You know the code better.
