Quoting Rob Herring (2022-05-18 09:13:48) > On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 12:23:03PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Rob Herring (2022-05-16 08:20:03) > > > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 06:39:21PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml > > > > index 409ecef967ce..e5fe60beb9fe 100644 > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml > > > > + - items: > > > > + - const: google,cros-ec-i2c > > > > + # For implementations of the FPMCU connected through SPI. > > > > + - items: > > > > + - const: google,cros-ec-fp > > > > + - const: google,cros-ec-spi > > > > + # For implementations of the EC is connected through SPI. > > > > + - items: > > > > + - const: google,cros-ec-spi > > > > + # For implementations of the EC is connected through RPMSG. > > > > + - items: > > > > + - const: google,cros-ec-rpmsg > > > > > > > > controller-data: > > > > description: > > > > @@ -176,6 +189,37 @@ allOf: > > > > - reg > > > > - interrupts > > > > > > > > + - if: > > > > + properties: > > > > + compatible: > > > > + contains: > > > > + const: google,cros-ec-fp > > > > + then: > > > > + properties: > > > > + '#address-cells': false > > > > + '#size-cells': false > > > > + typec: false > > > > + ec-pwm: false > > > > + keyboard-controller: false > > > > + proximity: false > > > > + codecs: false > > > > + cbas: false > > > > + > > > > + patternProperties: > > > > + "^i2c-tunnel[0-9]*$": false > > > > + "^regulator@[0-9]+$": false > > > > + "^extcon[0-9]*$": false > > > > > > Is the list of what's allowed shorter? If so, you could list those > > > properties and use 'additionalProperties: false'. > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > Or maybe this is a sign that this should be a separate schema document. > > > > I couldn't figure that out. I tried to add new properties here but it > > didn't work. > > Like this?: > > then: > properties: > allowed-prop-1: true > allowed-prop-2: true > allowed-prop-3: true > additionalProperties: false It doesn't seem to combine constraints? I get this error: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.example.dt.yaml: ec@0: Additional properties are not allowed ('$nodename' was unexpected) with this interdiff. I added the spi properties to reduce the additional properties that aren't allowed. ---8<---- diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml index 04b847fd5070..d47c7a273026 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml @@ -18,24 +18,21 @@ description: properties: compatible: - anyOf: + oneOf: - description: For implementations of the EC connected through I2C. - - items: - - const: google,cros-ec-i2c + const: google,cros-ec-i2c - description: For implementations of the FPMCU connected through SPI. - - items: + items: - const: google,cros-ec-fp - const: google,cros-ec-spi - description: For implementations of the EC connected through SPI. - - items: - - const: google,cros-ec-spi + const: google,cros-ec-spi - description: For implementations of the EC connected through RPMSG. - - items: - - const: google,cros-ec-rpmsg + const: google,cros-ec-rpmsg controller-data: description: @@ -200,19 +197,14 @@ allOf: const: google,cros-ec-fp then: properties: - '#address-cells': false - '#size-cells': false - typec: false - ec-pwm: false - keyboard-controller: false - proximity: false - codecs: false - cbas: false - - patternProperties: - "^i2c-tunnel[0-9]*$": false - "^regulator@[0-9]+$": false - "^extcon[0-9]*$": false + reset-gpios: true + boot0-gpios: true + vdd-supply: true + interrupts: true + compatible: true + reg: true + spi-max-frequency: true + additionalProperties: false required: - reset-gpios > > > And then when I tried to make a different schema document > > it complained that the example for google,cros-ec-spi in here had a > > problem. > > You probably need a custom 'select' so that both schemas aren't > matching. Otherwise a schema is applied if any of the compatible strings > match. I see. Maybe that's better vs. jamming it all into one file. > > > Can properties be defined in this section? > > Yes, but discouraged for vendor specific properties. The if/then should > really be just additional constraints. Ok.