On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 02:49:12PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > On 16.05.22 13:58, Max Krummenacher wrote: > > From: Max Krummenacher <max.krummenacher@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > The STMPE MFD device binding requires the child node to have a fixed > > name, i.e. with '_', not '-'. Otherwise the stmpe_adc, stmpe_touchscreen > > drivers will not be probed. > > IMO, the Linux driver should be fixed and the requirement to use a fixed > node name be dropped from the binding. The driver itself already probes > by compatible, the node name seems only to be used by the MFD driver to > detect which functions to enable. It could do the same by checking for > compatibles. Otherwise you invite a game of cat and mouse, where in > future, this is changed back again reintroducing the regression.. How would you handle in general such kind of change? Would you keep the driver probing for both the old name with the `_` and the compatible or you just break the compatibility? Francesco
