> -----Original Message----- > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, May 16, 2022 1:54 PM > To: Neal Liu <neal_liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Krzysztof > Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Joel Stanley <joel@xxxxxxxxx>; > Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx>; Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Sumit > Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx>; Christian König > <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>; Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > Li Yang <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-aspeed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linaro-mm-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: usb: add documentation for aspeed udc > > On 16/05/2022 03:59, Neal Liu wrote: > >>> Okay, I could rename it for next patch if you preferred. > >>> But there are lots of yaml files which are not named as first compatible. > >> > >> Yes, I know, I quite likely I also produced such bindings, but a > >> specific name is rather preferred. Otherwise you will have a > >> difficult naming choice when your next Aspeed UDC requires new > >> bindings file because of some differences (not yet known now). > >> > > We can rename the bindings if next Aspeed UDC needs, don't you think? > > Currently, Aspeed has no requirement. > > So just use proper name from the beginning.... > Okay, I'll rename it for next patch. Thanks for the review. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
