On 11/05/2022 10:23, Biju Das wrote: > Document Renesas RZ/G2UL ADC bindings. RZ/G2UL ADC is almost identical > to RZ/G2L, but it has 2 analog input channels compared to 8 channels > on the RZ/G2L. > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v3->v4: > * Removed unnecessary SoC specific reg description as it is > equivalent to the logic used in reg. > * Removed Items from reg. > v2->v3: > * Added generic description for reg. > * Improved schema validation by restricting both channel and reg to [0-1]. > v1->v2: > * Started using generic compatible for RZ/G2UL and added SoC specific validation > for channels. > --- > .../bindings/iio/adc/renesas,rzg2l-adc.yaml | 30 ++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/renesas,rzg2l-adc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/renesas,rzg2l-adc.yaml > index d66c24cae1e1..ae6226c1044e 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/renesas,rzg2l-adc.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/renesas,rzg2l-adc.yaml > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ properties: > compatible: > items: > - enum: > + - renesas,r9a07g043-adc # RZ/G2UL > - renesas,r9a07g044-adc # RZ/G2L > - renesas,r9a07g054-adc # RZ/V2L > - const: renesas,rzg2l-adc > @@ -76,16 +77,37 @@ patternProperties: > properties: > reg: > description: | > - The channel number. It can have up to 8 channels numbered from 0 to 7. > - items: > - - minimum: 0 > - maximum: 7 > + The channel number. > > required: > - reg > > additionalProperties: false > > +allOf: > + - if: > + properties: > + compatible: > + contains: > + const: renesas,r9a07g043-adc > + then: > + patternProperties: > + "^channel@[2-7]$": false > + "^channel@[0-1]$": > + type: object The actual type was defined earlier - in your first "patternProperties" - so this "type:object" should not be needed. > + properties: > + reg: > + minimum: 0 > + maximum: 1 > + else: > + patternProperties: > + "^channel@[0-7]$": > + type: object Ditto. With both removed: Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> Best regards, Krzysztof