> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 06:35:42PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > > +ð {
> > > > + status = "okay";
> > > > +
> > > > + gmac0: mac@0 {
> > > > + compatible = "mediatek,eth-mac";
> > > > + reg = <0>;
> > > > + phy-mode = "2500base-x";
> > > > +
> > > > + fixed-link {
> > > > + speed = <2500>;
> > > > + full-duplex;
> > > > + pause;
> > > > + };
> > > > + };
> > > > +
> > > > + gmac1: mac@1 {
> > > > + compatible = "mediatek,eth-mac";
> > > > + reg = <1>;
> > > > + phy-mode = "2500base-x";
> > > > +
> > > > + fixed-link {
> > > > + speed = <2500>;
> > > > + full-duplex;
> > > > + pause;
> > > > + };
> > > > + };
> > >
> > > Are both connected to the switch? It just seems unusual two have two
> > > fixed-link ports.
> >
> > afaik mac design supports autoneg only in 10M/100M/1G mode and mt7986 gmac1
> > is connected to a 2.5Gbps phy on mt7986-ref board.
>
> The MAC does not normally perform autoneg, the PHY
> does. phylib/phylink then tells the MAC the result of the
> negotiation. If there is a SERDES/PCS involved, and it is performing
> the autoneg, phylink should get told about the result of the autoneg
> and it will tell the MAC the result.
>
> So the gmac1 should just have phy-handle pointing to the PHY, not a
> fixed link.
>
> Andrew
adding Landen to the discussion to provide more hw details.
@Landen: any inputs on it?
Regards,
Lorenzo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
