On 2022-05-13 00:58:32, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 04/05/2022 11:11, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > On 2022-05-04 01:09:23, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >> Follow the typical practice and keep DSI1/DSI1 PHY disabled by default.
> >> They should be enabled in the board DT files. No existing boards use
> >> them at this moment.
> >
> > This practice also seems to be applied to dsi0/dsi0_phy across other
> > boards. Should this also be applied to sdm630.dtsi's dsi0/dsi0_phy
> > nodes, and them subsequently re-enabled in sdm630-sony-xperia-nile.dtsi?
>
> I will apply corresponding changes to sdm630.dtsi. However enabling them
> in sdm630-sony-xperia-nile.dtsi doens't make sense at this moment, since
> neither of nile platforms properly describes the mdss/mdp/panel
> configuration. I'm looking forward to seeing the updates for these
> devices trees though.
Thanks, I'll rebase your patches into my public Nile branch and fix this
up on my end, as to not forget this when hopefully sending more
enablement for this platform at "some point...".
- Marijn
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > - Marijn
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm660.dtsi | 3 +++
> >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm660.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm660.dtsi
> >> index eccf6fde16b4..023b0ac4118c 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm660.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm660.dtsi
> >> @@ -192,6 +192,8 @@ dsi1: dsi@c996000 {
> >> phys = <&dsi1_phy>;
> >> phy-names = "dsi";
> >>
> >> + status = "disabled";
> >> +
> >> ports {
> >> #address-cells = <1>;
> >> #size-cells = <0>;
> >> @@ -225,6 +227,7 @@ dsi1_phy: dsi-phy@c996400 {
> >>
> >> clocks = <&mmcc MDSS_AHB_CLK>, <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>;
> >> clock-names = "iface", "ref";
> >> + status = "disabled";
> >> };
> >> };
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.35.1
> >>
>
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
