On 2022-05-04 01:09:23, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Follow the typical practice and keep DSI1/DSI1 PHY disabled by default.
> They should be enabled in the board DT files. No existing boards use
> them at this moment.
This practice also seems to be applied to dsi0/dsi0_phy across other
boards. Should this also be applied to sdm630.dtsi's dsi0/dsi0_phy
nodes, and them subsequently re-enabled in sdm630-sony-xperia-nile.dtsi?
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Marijn
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm660.dtsi | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm660.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm660.dtsi
> index eccf6fde16b4..023b0ac4118c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm660.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm660.dtsi
> @@ -192,6 +192,8 @@ dsi1: dsi@c996000 {
> phys = <&dsi1_phy>;
> phy-names = "dsi";
>
> + status = "disabled";
> +
> ports {
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
> @@ -225,6 +227,7 @@ dsi1_phy: dsi-phy@c996400 {
>
> clocks = <&mmcc MDSS_AHB_CLK>, <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>;
> clock-names = "iface", "ref";
> + status = "disabled";
> };
> };
>
> --
> 2.35.1
>
