On 12/05/2022 03:51, Chris Packham wrote: >> >> I know the ap807 has something to do with the vagaries of the cn9130 >> SoC but isn't the "marvell,cn9130" still referring to the SoC. From >> what you've said shouldn't there be a "marvell,cn9130-crb" somewhere >> in the mix? >> >> Perhaps I've picked a bad example but the other dtbs I've poked at >> don't have any board binding. >> > The fsl,imx boards seem like a better example to follow > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml Yes. Best regards, Krzysztof
