Hi Jonathan,
Just one comment inline related to your previous review.
On 03/05/22 20:13, Shreeya Patel wrote:
From: Zhigang Shi <Zhigang.Shi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Add initial support for ltrf216a ambient light sensor.
Datasheet: gitlab.steamos.cloud/shreeya/iio/-/blob/main/LTRF216A.pdf
Co-developed-by: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Zhigang Shi <Zhigang.Shi@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v3
- Use u16 instead of u8 for int_time_fac
- Reorder headers in ltrf216a.c file
- Remove int_time_mapping table and use int_time_available
Changes in v2
- Add support for 25ms and 50ms integration time.
- Rename some of the macros as per names given in datasheet
- Add a comment for the mutex lock
- Use read_avail callback instead of attributes and set the
appropriate _available bit.
- Use FIELD_PREP() at appropriate places.
- Add a constant lookup table for integration time and reg val
- Use BIT() macro for magic numbers.
- Improve error handling at few places.
- Use get_unaligned_le24() and div_u64()
- Use probe_new() callback and devm functions
- Return errors in probe using dev_err_probe()
- Use DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS()
- Correct the formula for lux to use 0.45 instead of 0.8
drivers/iio/light/Kconfig | 10 +
drivers/iio/light/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/iio/light/ltrf216a.c | 343 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 354 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/iio/light/ltrf216a.c
diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/Kconfig b/drivers/iio/light/Kconfig
index a62c7b4b8678..33d2b24ba1da 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/light/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/iio/light/Kconfig
@@ -318,6 +318,16 @@ config SENSORS_LM3533
changes. The ALS-control output values can be set per zone for the
three current output channels.
+config LTRF216A
+ tristate "Liteon LTRF216A Light Sensor"
+ depends on I2C
+ help
+ If you say Y or M here, you get support for Liteon LTRF216A
+ Ambient Light Sensor.
+
+ If built as a dynamically linked module, it will be called
+ ltrf216a.
+
config LTR501
tristate "LTR-501ALS-01 light sensor"
depends on I2C
diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/Makefile b/drivers/iio/light/Makefile
index d10912faf964..8fa91b9fe5b6 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/light/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/iio/light/Makefile
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_ISL29028) += isl29028.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ISL29125) += isl29125.o
obj-$(CONFIG_JSA1212) += jsa1212.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_LM3533) += lm3533-als.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_LTRF216A) += ltrf216a.o
obj-$(CONFIG_LTR501) += ltr501.o
obj-$(CONFIG_LV0104CS) += lv0104cs.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MAX44000) += max44000.o
diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/ltrf216a.c b/drivers/iio/light/ltrf216a.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1ad1eb4a4c6d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/iio/light/ltrf216a.c
@@ -0,0 +1,343 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * LTRF216A Ambient Light Sensor
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2021 Lite-On Technology Corp (Singapore)
+ * Author: Shi Zhigang <Zhigang.Shi@xxxxxxxxxx>
+ *
+ * IIO driver for LTRF216A (7-bit I2C slave address 0x53).
+ */
+
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/pm.h>
+#include <linux/iio/iio.h>
+#include <asm/unaligned.h>
+
+#define LTRF216A_DRV_NAME "ltrf216a"
+
+#define LTRF216A_MAIN_CTRL 0x00
+
+#define LTRF216A_ALS_DATA_STATUS BIT(3)
+#define LTRF216A_ALS_ENABLE_MASK BIT(1)
+
+#define LTRF216A_ALS_MEAS_RES 0x04
+#define LTRF216A_MAIN_STATUS 0x07
+#define LTRF216A_CLEAR_DATA_0 0x0A
+
+#define LTRF216A_ALS_DATA_0 0x0D
+
+static const int ltrf216a_int_time_available[5][2] = {
+ {0, 400000},
+ {0, 200000},
+ {0, 100000},
+ {0, 50000},
+ {0, 25000},
+};
+
+static const int ltrf216a_int_time_reg[5][2] = {
+ {400, 0x03},
+ {200, 0x13},
+ {100, 0x22},
+ {50, 0x31},
+ {25, 0x40},
+};
+
+struct ltrf216a_data {
+ struct i2c_client *client;
+ u32 int_time;
+ u16 int_time_fac;
+ u8 als_gain_fac;
+ struct mutex mutex; /* Protect read and write operations */
I wasn't really sure about your comment related to the lock description
here.
I see we are using these locks in read_raw and write_raw functions only and
hence I've added the above comment.
Thanks,
Shreeya Patel