On 20/04/2022 14:35, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > > On 20/04/2022 11:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 16:21:43 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> The node names should be generic and SPI NOR dtschema expects "flash". >>> >>> >> >> Looks like no one wants to take this, so let me take care of it. >> > > First thing would have been a ping on the patch, don't you think? And what does it change? The operating-points clean up [1] was sent in August last year, then in this April, and you responded only when I wrote pick-up. The Google cros-ec clean up was sent in Feb and two weeks later pinged [2]. Pinging and resending apparently does not help. It's okay, happens, we are all extra busy and we all pretty often do it as part of community/hobby/spare time. > Anyway as I > said the last time, if you take DTS patches for mediatek I don't want to take the patches for Mediatek. But I also don't want to resend and ping each one of them because it did not work in the past. > , I'd need a stable > branch I can merge so that we don't have any merge conflicts in the end. Can you just pick the patch? [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=%22arm64%3A+dts%3A+mediatek%3A+align+operating-points+table+name+with+dtschema%22 [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=%22arm64%3A+dts%3A+mt8183%3A+align+Google+CROS+EC+PWM+node+name+with+dtschema%22 Best regards, Krzysztof
