Hi, On 19/04/2022 17:20, Rob Herring wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 12:33:01PM +0530, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:The DSS IP on the ti-am65x soc supports an additional register space, named "common1". Further. the IP services a maximum number of 2 interrupts. Add the missing register space "common1" and the additional interrupt. Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@xxxxxx> --- .../devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml index 5c7d2cbc4aac..102059e9e0d5 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ properties: Addresses to each DSS memory region described in the SoC's TRM. items: - description: common DSS register area + - description: common1 DSS register areaYou've just broken the ABI. New entries have to go on the end.
I'm curious, if the 'reg-names' is a required property, as it is here, does this still break the ABI?
Tomi
