On 4/14/2022 1:03 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 14/04/2022 23:00, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
Hi Dmitry
On 4/14/2022 12:43 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-04-14 12:20:31)
On 14/04/2022 19:40, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 5:19 AM Sankeerth Billakanti
<quic_sbillaka@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This series adds support for generic eDP panel over aux_bus.
These changes are dependent on the following series:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=613654&state=*
You're basically depending on the last two patches of that series.
What's the plan there? In patchwork they're marked as "Not
Applicable". If they're good to go, maybe we should land them? If not,
maybe you should include them (with Dmitry as the author, of course)
at the beginning of your series?
No, please do not resend patches. The patches in question are marked as
'Not applicable' as they are really not applicable to Bjorn's tree.
It would be better to point to the correct patchwork:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98585/
Note those patches still lack the R-B tag. I can include them anyway,
basing on Sankeerth's Tested-by tag, but the formal R-B would also
be good.
Can you resend those as not RFC?
Yes, please resend these, I can ack them.
Previously I held off my ack, as kuogee ran into some issues testing
them which was later concluded to be a mismatch in QC internal trees
due to different versions of the changes.( another reason why we
should get these landed ).
Now, that Sankeerth has tested these, if you can remove RFC and post
them, I can ack the.
Well, you can ack those patches without them being resent. You have
already added your Reviewed-by to first three patches (which were merged
during last window).
I thought you might have to rebase them :) that way you could have
resent the rebased patch with the RFC tag removed.
If you dont, you now have my R-b.
Thanks
Abhinav
