On 28-03-22, 13:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 28/03/2022 13:29, 이왕석 wrote: > >> --------- Original Message --------- > >> Sender : Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Date : 2022-03-28 18:38 (GMT+9) > >> Title : Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add support for Axis, ARTPEC-8 PCIe driver > >> > >> On 28/03/2022 11:02, 이왕석 wrote: > >>>> --------- Original Message --------- > >>>> Sender : Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> Date : 2022-03-28 16:12 (GMT+9) > >>>> Title : Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add support for Axis, ARTPEC-8 PCIe driver > >>>> > >>>> On 28/03/2022 03:44, 이왕석 wrote: > >>>>> This series patches include newly PCIe support for Axis ARTPEC-8 SoC. > >>>>> ARTPEC-8 is the SoC platform of Axis Communications. > >>>>> PCIe controller driver and phy driver have been newly added. > >>>>> There is also a new MAINTAINER in the addition of phy driver. > >>>>> PCIe controller is designed based on Design-Ware PCIe controller IP > >>>>> and PCIe phy is desinged based on SAMSUNG PHY IP. > >>>>> It also includes modifications to the Design-Ware controller driver to > >>>>> run the 64bit-based ARTPEC-8 PCIe controller driver. > >>>>> It consists of 6 patches in total. > >>>>> > >>>>> This series has been tested on AXIS SW bring-up board > >>>>> with ARTPEC-8 chipset. > >>>> > >>>> You lost mail threading. This makes reading this difficult for us. Plus > >>>> you sent something non-applicable (patch #2), so please resend. > >>>> > >>>> Knowing recent Samsung reluctance to extend existing drivers and always > >>>> duplicate, please provide description/analysis why this driver cannot be > >>>> combined with existing driver. The answer like: we need several syscon > >>>> because we do not implement other frameworks (like interconnect) are not > >>>> valid. > >>>> > >>>> Best regards, > >>>> Krzysztof > >>> > >>> Hello, Krzysztof > >>> Thanks for your review. > >>> > >>> patch#2 was sent to the wrong format so sent again. > >>> Sorry for causing confusion. > >> > >> The first sending was HTML. Second was broken text, so still not working. > >> > >> Please resend everything with proper threading. > > > > Hello, Krzysztof > > > > I sent patch#2 three times. > > due to the influence of the email system, > > there was something wrong with the first and second mails. > > Sorry for causing confusion. > > Did you receive the third patch i sent you? > > Maybe, I don't know. It's not threaded so it's difficult to find it > among other 100 emails... Correct, this is spread over whole list, please resend the whole series in a single shot without threading being broken -- ~Vinod
