Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > From: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > For some MediaTek SoCs, like MT8186, it's possible that the sram regulator > is shared between CPU and CCI. > > Signed-off-by: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> nit: missing your sign-off. > --- > drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c > index 9e9bce0ff235..8f688d47e64b 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c > @@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ static int mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info, int cpu) > } > > /* Both presence and absence of sram regulator are valid cases. */ > - info->sram_reg = regulator_get_exclusive(cpu_dev, "sram"); > + info->sram_reg = regulator_get_optional(cpu_dev, "sram"); The changelog says that this regulator may be shared with CCI, so I understand it's no longer exclusive. But here you make it optional, which should be explained in the changelog. If it's not actually optional, then it should just be normal "get". Kevin
