On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 12:24:14PM +0100, Rui Miguel Silva wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 11:48:54AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 02:10:53PM +0100, Rui Miguel Silva wrote:
> > > +
> > > + mhu_hse1: mailbox@1b820000 {
> > > + compatible = "arm,mhuv2-tx", "arm,primecell";
> > > + reg = <0x1b820000 0x1000>;
> > > + clocks = <&refclk100mhz>;
> > > + clock-names = "apb_pclk";
> > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 45 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > + #mbox-cells = <2>;
> > > + arm,mhuv2-protocols = <0 0>;
> > > + secure-status = "okay"; /* secure-world-only */
> >
> > Please drop the above. Though I see it is in the binding, no one uses
> > it in the kernel and I prefer not to have this.
>
> the secure partitions in secure world use this mailbox to
> doorbell the secure enclave so, after talking with Rob he suggested to
> use this bindings to make this clear. So, I will keep this ones.
>
Hi Rob,
Since this is first user of this binding(which is there for a while, but
no users in the kernel code base), are you fine with this ?
--
Regards,
Sudeep
