On 30/03/2022 18:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: (...) >> >> These examples are showing how the SFP gets hooked up directly to a MAC >> or directly to a PHY. Would you prefer them to be in the ethernet-mac >> and ethernet-phy yaml files instead? It seems utterly perverse to split >> an example across several different yaml files. > > Probably PHY or MAC is better place, because it defines the "sfp" property. > > How is it different from other cases like this in bindings (clocks, > power domains, GPIOs)? IOW, why SFP is special? If it is, sure, let's > keep it here... BTW, Rob actually pointed out the difference here - it's only one such provider binding (unlike clock controllers) - and said it's fine, so good for me. Best regards, Krzysztof
