On 28-03-22, 17:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 28/03/2022 16:30, Vinod Koul wrote: > > clk-virt and mc-virt interconnect nodes were named interconnect@0 and > > interconnect@1. That is incorrect as we don't have unit addresses 0/1 > > for these node. > > > > This causes warning: > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi:255.27-259.4: > > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /interconnect@0: > > node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi:261.26-265.4: > > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /interconnect@1: > > node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi:255.27-259.4: > > Warning (unique_unit_address_if_enabled): /interconnect@0: > > duplicate unit-address (also used in node /soc@0) > > > > Rename the nodes to interconnect-0 and interconnect-1 to fix the > > warning. > > > > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > The DT schema will still need to be fixed because it expects 'reg' address. Yes will update that as well.. > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks -- ~Vinod
