On 28/03/2022 16:30, Vinod Koul wrote: > clk-virt and mc-virt interconnect nodes were named interconnect@0 and > interconnect@1. That is incorrect as we don't have unit addresses 0/1 > for these node. > > This causes warning: > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi:255.27-259.4: > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /interconnect@0: > node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi:261.26-265.4: > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /interconnect@1: > node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi:255.27-259.4: > Warning (unique_unit_address_if_enabled): /interconnect@0: > duplicate unit-address (also used in node /soc@0) > > Rename the nodes to interconnect-0 and interconnect-1 to fix the > warning. > > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> > Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) The DT schema will still need to be fixed because it expects 'reg' address. Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> Best regards, Krzysztof
