On 14-03-22, 12:24, Kuldeep Singh wrote:
> Dma-names order matters here.
> As per pl022 binding, dma-names order specify rx,tx and all DTs which
> have tx,rx as order start raising dtbs_chek warning. Thus, need to
> reverse this order. Please note, no functional change in this patch
> apart from just fixing warning.
>
> Warning:
> 'rx' was expected
> 'tx' was expected
Hmm. I see your point now.
dma-names:
description:
There must be at least one channel named "tx" for transmit and named "rx"
for receive.
minItems: 2
maxItems: 32
additionalItems: true
items:
- const: rx
- const: tx
I was expecting above to allow adding the items in any order, but
looks like the order is fixed with this.
--
viresh
