On Monday 08 September 2014 14:43:55 Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > > and CACHE_LINE_SIZE seems to be what ePAPR calls cache-block-size, i.e. > > the fundamental unit of cache management as seen from the CPU, independent > > of how it is physically organized. > > Yeah. Well, actually that means the variable in cache-l2x0.c should > be renamed from CACHE_LINE_SIZE to CACHE_BLOCK_SIZE > if we go with that terminology, right? That is the real change that > is needed to make terminology consistent then. Not sure if it's worth it. It may be a case of IBM terminology being at odds with ARM terminology. ;-) Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
