On 02-03-22, 07:18, Peter Geis wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 3:16 AM Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 01-03-22, 09:52, Peter Geis wrote: > > > Good Morning, > > > > > > Would it be possible to pull this patch individually, to fix the > > > current error reported by Rob? > > > > This does not apply for me on phy-next. What was this based on..? > > This is based on linux-next, which the applicable patch was accepted on 24 Feb. > The original patch was correct, but it seems a merge error happened > and these two lines were moved into an incorrect location. > This patch corrects that, but I see on the original patch chain you > are discussing reverting and reapplying to fix it. Ok let me revert than so that it is easy for everyone to fix up Thanks -- ~Vinod
