On 01-03-22, 09:52, Peter Geis wrote:
> Good Morning,
>
> Would it be possible to pull this patch individually, to fix the
> current error reported by Rob?
This does not apply for me on phy-next. What was this based on..?
>
> Thanks,
> Peter
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 8:57 AM Peter Geis <pgwipeout@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The rockchip,rk3568-pipe-grf and rockchip,rk3568-pipe-phy-grf
> > compatibles were incorrectly assigned to the syscon, simple-mfd
> > enumeration, vice only the syscon enumeration.
> > This leads a dtbs_check failure.
> >
> > Move these to the syscon enumeration.
> >
> > Fixes: b3df807e1fb0 ("dt-bindings: soc: grf: add naneng combo phy register compatible")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml
> > index 072318fcd57b..5079e9d24af6 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml
> > @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ properties:
> > - items:
> > - enum:
> > - rockchip,rk3288-sgrf
> > + - rockchip,rk3568-pipe-grf
> > + - rockchip,rk3568-pipe-phy-grf
> > - rockchip,rk3568-usb2phy-grf
> > - rockchip,rv1108-usbgrf
> > - const: syscon
> > @@ -39,8 +41,6 @@ properties:
> > - rockchip,rk3399-grf
> > - rockchip,rk3399-pmugrf
> > - rockchip,rk3568-grf
> > - - rockchip,rk3568-pipe-grf
> > - - rockchip,rk3568-pipe-phy-grf
> > - rockchip,rk3568-pmugrf
> > - rockchip,rv1108-grf
> > - rockchip,rv1108-pmugrf
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
--
~Vinod
