On 23/02/2022 16:35, Sui Jingfeng wrote: > > On 2022/2/23 21:56, 隋景峰 wrote: >> Something like this: >> >> dt-bindings: display: Add Loongson display controller > > Hi, Thanks for resending in a proper format. I already replied to your original post, so let me paste it here as well. > > We are not a platform device driver, there is no > of_device_id defined in my driver. In other word, > my driver will not bind against devices whose compatible > is "loongson,ls7a1000-dc". We just parse the device tree > actively, find necessary information of interest. > > What's the meaning of dt-bindings by definition ? > In this case, can I use the word "dt-bindings" in the commit title? This is a patch for specific subsystem, so as Rob said, it should follow subsystem conventions. The patch itself is a dt-bindings patch, so there is nothing here special which would encourage for any exception. > > I want to follow the conventions, but get some push back, > Krzysztof say that he can not see any bindings, these are not bindings. I said in comment to your patch with DTS, which you called bindings, that there are no bindings at all in it. Because in your patch with DTS you did not include bindings, but you called it bindings. Here, this is a patch with bindings, so your comment "these are not bindings" is not true. Best regards, Krzysztof
