Hi Macpaul, On Thu, 2022-02-17 at 14:24 +0800, Macpaul Lin wrote: > On 2/16/22 7:31 PM, Tinghan Shen wrote: > > This series adds basic SoC support for Mediatek's SoC MT8195. > > > > --- > > Changes in v11: > > - rebase on 5.17-rc4 > > Changes in v10: > > - clean CC list > > Changes in v9: > > - remove duplicated cpus dt-bindings patch in v8 > > Changes in v8: > > - v7 mediatek,spi-mtk-nor.yaml patch is applied in branch for-5.17 at > > kernel/git/broonie/spi.git > > - v7 pinctrl-mt8195.yaml patch is applied in branch for-next at > > kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git > > - add cortex-a78 compatible to cpus dt-bindings > > - add mediatek,drive-strength-adv property to pinctrl dt-bindings > > - fix evb dts > > - remove i2c nodes with disabled status from dts > > - fix pin properties not match pinctrl dt-bindings > > - remove unnecessary u3port* > > - fix dtsi > > - fix node format > > - reorder oscillator* nodes > > - fix node name of cpu idle nodes > > - remove clock-frequency property in the timer node > > - reorder clock and clock names in usb nodes > > Changes in v7: > > - refine title of spi-nor dt-bindings patch > > - refine commit message of pinctrl dt-bindings patch > > - update pinctrl-mt8195.yaml > > - change property pattern from 'pins' to '^pins' > > - update examples with new property in descriptions > > - add new example > > - drop '_' from node names of pinctrl subnodes in mt8195-evb.dts > > Changes in v6: > > - rebase on 5.16-rc1 > > - add new clock name to spi-nor dt-bindings > > - add "pins" property in pinctrl dt-bindings > > - fix fails of dtbs_checks > > - remove "arm,armv8" not matched in yaml from cpu compatile > > - fix node name of xhci > > - remvoe xhci upstreaming wakeup properties > > - remove xhci unused properties address-cells and size-cells > > - fix node name of ufs-phy > > - fix node name of spi-nor > > - fix node name and sub-nodes of pinctrl > > - fix mmc compatible > > Changes in v5: > > - enable basic nodes in mt8195-evb.dts > > - remove dedicated clock nodes > > - add mmc2 node > > - fix interrupt number of pinctrl node > > - update clock nodes to apply internal fixes > > - add dt-bindings for perficfg node > > > > v4 thread: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210922093303.23720-2-seiya.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx/__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!xv2H7ZXYIUG7YY1R5OuFgbvDxyfaE6dkkD5H_PciKAZAb5jk-uThgSgItGuvt2d6gCs$ > > v3 thread: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210601075350.31515-2-seiya.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx/__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!xv2H7ZXYIUG7YY1R5OuFgbvDxyfaE6dkkD5H_PciKAZAb5jk-uThgSgItGuvgIQSNYo$ > > v2 thread: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210319023427.16711-10-seiya.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx/__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!xv2H7ZXYIUG7YY1R5OuFgbvDxyfaE6dkkD5H_PciKAZAb5jk-uThgSgItGuvBx50AeU$ > > v1 thread: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210316111443.3332-11-seiya.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx/__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!xv2H7ZXYIUG7YY1R5OuFgbvDxyfaE6dkkD5H_PciKAZAb5jk-uThgSgItGuvpH_NtEY$ > > --- > > > > Tinghan Shen (3): > > dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: Add mt8195 pericfg compatible > > dt-bindings: pinctrl: mt8195: Add mediatek,drive-strength-adv property > > arm64: dts: Add mediatek SoC mt8195 and evaluation board > > > > .../arm/mediatek/mediatek,pericfg.yaml | 1 + > > .../bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8195.yaml | 35 + > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/Makefile | 1 + > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-evb.dts | 161 +++ > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi | 1049 +++++++++++++++++ > > 5 files changed, 1247 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-evb.dts > > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi > > > > Just trying to clarify something. > Dear Tinghan, is there any "lines of code" changed between v10 and v11 > due to the rebase? Is that you just updated the parent commit hash for > rebasing this patchset to 5.17-rc4? I've just get confused if v10 and > v11 are duplicated then should we need to review the patch again in detail? > > Thanks. > Macpaul Lin Thanks for your review. There's no change introduced after rebase v10 to 5.17-rc4. v11 and v10 are the same. Best regards, TingHan
