On 15/02/2022 11:49, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 10:41:06AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 09:02:25AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 15/02/2022 08:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 at 08:40, Uwe Kleine-König >>>> <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> [dropped Anson Huang and Yash Shah from Cc: which were not reachable for >>>>> my last mail] >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:21:39PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Changes since v1: >>>>>> 1. Add tags. >>>>>> 2. Adjust subject (Uwe). >>>>> >>>>> However you only took a part of my suggestion ... >>>>> >>>>>> Krzysztof Kozlowski (15): >>>>>> dt-bindings: pwm: allwinner,sun4i-a10: Include generic pwm schema >>>>>> dt-bindings: pwm: imx: Include generic pwm schema >>>>>> dt-bindings: pwm: intel,lgm: Include generic pwm schema >>>>>> dt-bindings: pwm: iqs620a: Include generic pwm schema >>>>>> dt-bindings: pwm: mxs: Include generic pwm schema >>>>>> dt-bindings: pwm: rockchip: Include generic pwm schema >>>>>> dt-bindings: pwm: sifive: Include generic pwm schema >>>>>> dt-bindings: pwm: renesas,pwm: Include generic pwm schema >>>>>> dt-bindings: pwm: toshiba,visconti: Include generic pwm schema >>>>>> dt-bindings: pwm: brcm,bcm7038: Do not require pwm-cells twice >>>>>> dt-bindings: pwm: intel,keembay: Do not require pwm-cells twice >>>>> >>>>> ... The actual patch has a space after the comma, I like this variant >>>>> without comma better as this is a compatible string. >>>> >>>> I am confused. My patch does not have comma after space. Your reply >>>> had such in the subject, but not in the proposed new subject you wrote >>>> in msg, so I left it as is. Without comma. If you still see comma, it >>>> is something with your mail client. >>>> >>>> See: >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20220214212154.8853-12-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u >>>> >>>> Also reply from Vijayakannan does not have comma: >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20220214081605.161394-11-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#m80af695f2c751341bc971114aefa00ccc929a3ec >> >> Strange: I have this mail four times in my mailboxes (via >> linux-arm-kernel, linux-pwm, kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and directly). In the >> two latter the Subject line is broken in two: > > I was wrong. The ones to kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and the linux-arm-kernel > one are the ones with the linebreak. > > Hmm, > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2022-February/717310.html > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2022-February/717304.html > > has the linebreaks, too. Still I wonder what is different between > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx. Other threads - not only mine - are also affected: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2022-February/714311.html http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2022-February/714316.html http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2022-February/714364.html Best regards, Krzysztof
