On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 10:41:06AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 09:02:25AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 15/02/2022 08:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 at 08:40, Uwe Kleine-König > > > <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> [dropped Anson Huang and Yash Shah from Cc: which were not reachable for > > >> my last mail] > > >> > > >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:21:39PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> Changes since v1: > > >>> 1. Add tags. > > >>> 2. Adjust subject (Uwe). > > >> > > >> However you only took a part of my suggestion ... > > >> > > >>> Krzysztof Kozlowski (15): > > >>> dt-bindings: pwm: allwinner,sun4i-a10: Include generic pwm schema > > >>> dt-bindings: pwm: imx: Include generic pwm schema > > >>> dt-bindings: pwm: intel,lgm: Include generic pwm schema > > >>> dt-bindings: pwm: iqs620a: Include generic pwm schema > > >>> dt-bindings: pwm: mxs: Include generic pwm schema > > >>> dt-bindings: pwm: rockchip: Include generic pwm schema > > >>> dt-bindings: pwm: sifive: Include generic pwm schema > > >>> dt-bindings: pwm: renesas,pwm: Include generic pwm schema > > >>> dt-bindings: pwm: toshiba,visconti: Include generic pwm schema > > >>> dt-bindings: pwm: brcm,bcm7038: Do not require pwm-cells twice > > >>> dt-bindings: pwm: intel,keembay: Do not require pwm-cells twice > > >> > > >> ... The actual patch has a space after the comma, I like this variant > > >> without comma better as this is a compatible string. > > > > > > I am confused. My patch does not have comma after space. Your reply > > > had such in the subject, but not in the proposed new subject you wrote > > > in msg, so I left it as is. Without comma. If you still see comma, it > > > is something with your mail client. > > > > > > See: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20220214212154.8853-12-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u > > > > > > Also reply from Vijayakannan does not have comma: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20220214081605.161394-11-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#m80af695f2c751341bc971114aefa00ccc929a3ec > > Strange: I have this mail four times in my mailboxes (via > linux-arm-kernel, linux-pwm, kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and directly). In the > two latter the Subject line is broken in two: I was wrong. The ones to kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and the linux-arm-kernel one are the ones with the linebreak. Hmm, http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2022-February/717310.html http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2022-February/717304.html has the linebreaks, too. Still I wonder what is different between kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
