Re: [PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: Add arm,mali-valhall compatible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 at 16:23, Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11/02/2022 20:27, alyssa.rosenzweig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From the kernel's perspective, pre-CSF Valhall is more or less
> > compatible with Bifrost, although they differ to userspace. Add a
> > compatible for Valhall to the existing Bifrost bindings documentation.
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
> > index 63a08f3f321d..48aeabd2ed68 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ properties:
> >            - rockchip,px30-mali
> >            - rockchip,rk3568-mali
> >        - const: arm,mali-bifrost # Mali Bifrost GPU model/revision is fully discoverable
> > +      - const: arm,mali-valhall # Mali Valhall GPU model/revision is fully discoverable
>
> It might be worth spelling out here that this is *pre-CSF* Valhall. I'm
> pretty sure we're going to need different bindings for CSF GPUs.

Good point - maybe either make it arm,mali-valhall-jm then?

Cheers,
Daniel



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux