On 11/02/2022 20:27, alyssa.rosenzweig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > From the kernel's perspective, pre-CSF Valhall is more or less > compatible with Bifrost, although they differ to userspace. Add a > compatible for Valhall to the existing Bifrost bindings documentation. > > Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml > index 63a08f3f321d..48aeabd2ed68 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ properties: > - rockchip,px30-mali > - rockchip,rk3568-mali > - const: arm,mali-bifrost # Mali Bifrost GPU model/revision is fully discoverable > + - const: arm,mali-valhall # Mali Valhall GPU model/revision is fully discoverable It might be worth spelling out here that this is *pre-CSF* Valhall. I'm pretty sure we're going to need different bindings for CSF GPUs. Steve > > reg: > maxItems: 1
