+Kamal,
On 2/11/22 2:33 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> BCM4908 uses the same I2C hw as BCM63xx / BCM67xx / BCM68xx SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm4908/bcm4908.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm4908/bcm4908.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm4908/bcm4908.dtsi
> index b0bc5262beca..9ae298e7d6cf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm4908/bcm4908.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm4908/bcm4908.dtsi
> @@ -464,6 +464,15 @@ nandcs: nand@0 {
> };
> };
>
> + i2c@2100 {
> + compatible = "brcm,brcmstb-i2c";
We should be making it clearer in the DT binding, but this should be
brcm,brcmper-i2c since that was the compatible string added for the DSL
class of chips, I forgot whether Kamal had to key off that compatible or
not, it does not look it.
--
Florian
