On 07/02/2022 10:33, Lee Jones wrote: > On Sun, 06 Feb 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 11/01/2022 18:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> The max77843 shares some parts with max77693 but it lacked bindings. All >>> its compatibles were undocumented. Add basic bindings for max77843, >>> matching existing devicetree. These are not complete bindings, but >>> rather reverse-engineered to match current state. >>> >>> I do not have access to device with MAX77843, so if anyone else >>> volunteers to be the bindings maintainer, please join. >>> >>> Changes since v1 >>> ================ >>> 1. MFD: Use absolute path to schemas. >>> 2. Regulator: mention all allowed properties, >>> additionalProperties=false, add min/max values for voltages and >>> current, don't use patternProperties when not needed. >>> 3. extcon: Use absolute path to schemas. >>> >>> Dependencies >>> ============ >>> 1. Patch 1/5 (dts): nothing depends on it, sending here so Rob's automatic >>> checker won't complain about DTS. >>> I will take it via Samsung SoC tree. >>> >>> 2. The patch 4/5 (mfd bindings) depends on regulator and extcon, so they >>> should come together (2+3+4+5). >>> >> Dear Lee, >> >> This patchset was reviewed and there are no outstanding issues. Could >> you pick up patches 2-5 (skipping DTS patch) via MFD tree? > > Are the subsystem maintainers not going to review/ack? > Would be nice to have them, but maybe since these are dt-bindings maybe they were skipped? Or maybe it was the end-of-year holidays? I can resend hoping it will trigger more acks. Do you wish me to resend? Best regards, Krzysztof
