On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 15:55:39 +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > The VOP2 is found on newer Rockchip SoCs like the rk3568 or the rk3566. > The binding differs slightly from the existing VOP binding, so add a new > binding file for it. > > Changes since v3: > - drop redundant _vop suffix from clock names > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml | 146 ++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 146 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13): yamllint warnings/errors: dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.example.dt.yaml: vop@fe040000: clock-names:0: 'aclk' was expected From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.example.dt.yaml: vop@fe040000: clock-names:1: 'hclk' was expected From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs): See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1584511 This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch series is generally the most recent rc1. If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to date: pip3 install dtschema --upgrade Please check and re-submit.
