Hi Christophe, christophe.kerello@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on Wed, 26 Jan 2022 12:08:38 +0100: > Hi Srinivas, Miquel, > > On 1/25/22 11:44, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > > > > > > On 05/01/2022 13:57, Christophe Kerello wrote: > >> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c > >> index e765d3d0542e..e11c74db64f9 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c > >> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c > >> @@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct >> nvmem_config *config) > >> if (config->wp_gpio) > >> nvmem->wp_gpio = config->wp_gpio; > >> - else > >> + else if (config->reg_write) > > This is clearly not going to work for everyone. > > > > A flag in nvmem_config to indicate that wp gpio is managed by provider > driver would be the right thing to do here. > > Based on your inputs, I will add a new boolean flag in nvmen_config (proposal name: skip_wp_gpio) and I will set it to true in mtdcore.c when nvmen_config structure is initialized. It will be part of the V2. Fine by me. Thanks for your work on this. > > Regards, > Christophe Kerello. > > >> nvmem->wp_gpio = gpiod_get_optional(config->dev, "wp", > >> GPIOD_OUT_HIGH); > > > > --srini > > Cheers, Miquèl