On 08/28/2014 03:23 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > The problem is that it is a fwd message? I did send it first the 5th Yes. > of August and did not get any feedback, this is why I tried to > different destinations. Shall I just resend it? Usually you just add a RESEND / REPOST before the patch tag. The forward header makes the submission useless (unless the TIP team has time to manually edit the patch). > I am working on an fpga camera (http://qtec.com) connected via pcie to > an amd fusion APU (64 bits). The hardware of the fpga is described > with devicetrees. So you are telling me that there is (or will be) 64bit x86 hardware which is using the device tree instead EFI, SFI or something like that. Is that so? If so it is worth mentioning that in the patch description that this code is used on x86 hard which is not yet part of the kernel. Either way, the x86 team + lkml is the destination that should apply that patch so a proper repost (with the altered description I mentioned) would be nice. > Thanks! Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
