Hi Jerome,
Thank you very much for your reply.
On 2022/1/10 22:29, Jerome Brunet wrote:
[ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
On Mon 10 Jan 2022 at 16:56, Yu Tu <yu.tu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Title is bad (like several other patches in this series) - Please fix it
Ok.
Using the common Clock code to describe the UART baud rate clock
makes it easier for the UART driver to be compatible with the
baud rate requirements of the UART IP on different meson chips.
Signed-off-by: Yu Tu <yu.tu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c | 224 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 163 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
index 7570958d010c..1004fd0b0c9e 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
*/
#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
#include <linux/console.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
@@ -65,9 +66,7 @@
#define AML_UART_RECV_IRQ(c) ((c) & 0xff)
/* AML_UART_REG5 bits */
-#define AML_UART_BAUD_MASK 0x7fffff
#define AML_UART_BAUD_USE BIT(23)
-#define AML_UART_BAUD_XTAL BIT(24)
#define AML_UART_PORT_NUM 12
#define AML_UART_PORT_OFFSET 6
@@ -76,6 +75,13 @@
#define AML_UART_POLL_USEC 5
#define AML_UART_TIMEOUT_USEC 10000
+struct meson_uart_data {
+ struct uart_port port;
+ struct clk *pclk;
+ struct clk *baud_clk;
+ bool use_xtal_clk;
+};
+
static struct uart_driver meson_uart_driver;
static struct uart_port *meson_ports[AML_UART_PORT_NUM];
@@ -268,14 +274,11 @@ static void meson_uart_reset(struct uart_port *port)
static int meson_uart_startup(struct uart_port *port)
{
u32 val;
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret;
- val = readl(port->membase + AML_UART_CONTROL);
- val |= AML_UART_CLEAR_ERR;
- writel(val, port->membase + AML_UART_CONTROL);
- val &= ~AML_UART_CLEAR_ERR;
- writel(val, port->membase + AML_UART_CONTROL);
+ meson_uart_reset(port);
+ val = readl(port->membase + AML_UART_CONTROL);
val |= (AML_UART_RX_EN | AML_UART_TX_EN);
writel(val, port->membase + AML_UART_CONTROL);
@@ -293,19 +296,17 @@ static int meson_uart_startup(struct uart_port *port)
static void meson_uart_change_speed(struct uart_port *port, unsigned long baud)
{
+ struct meson_uart_data *private_data = port->private_data;
u32 val;
while (!meson_uart_tx_empty(port))
cpu_relax();
- if (port->uartclk == 24000000) {
- val = ((port->uartclk / 3) / baud) - 1;
- val |= AML_UART_BAUD_XTAL;
- } else {
- val = ((port->uartclk * 10 / (baud * 4) + 5) / 10) - 1;
- }
+ val = readl(port->membase + AML_UART_REG5);
val |= AML_UART_BAUD_USE;
writel(val, port->membase + AML_UART_REG5);
+
+ clk_set_rate(private_data->baud_clk, baud);
}
static void meson_uart_set_termios(struct uart_port *port,
@@ -395,11 +396,27 @@ static int meson_uart_verify_port(struct uart_port *port,
static void meson_uart_release_port(struct uart_port *port)
{
- /* nothing to do */
+ struct meson_uart_data *private_data = port->private_data;
+
+ clk_disable_unprepare(private_data->baud_clk);
+ clk_disable_unprepare(private_data->pclk);
}
static int meson_uart_request_port(struct uart_port *port)
{
+ struct meson_uart_data *private_data = port->private_data;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = clk_prepare_enable(private_data->pclk);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
In the previous version of the series, you already been asked to the
enable of pclk in the probe. Optimization should not be mixed with this
series
Please make sure all comments are addressed before re-posting
I'm sorry. I misunderstood you earlier. I'm going to move into the probe
function.
+
+ ret = clk_prepare_enable(private_data->baud_clk);
+ if (ret) {
+ clk_disable_unprepare(private_data->pclk);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
return 0;
}
@@ -629,55 +646,105 @@ static struct uart_driver meson_uart_driver = {
.cons = MESON_SERIAL_CONSOLE,
};
-static inline struct clk *meson_uart_probe_clock(struct device *dev,
- const char *id)
+#define CLK_NAME(name) \
+({\
+ char clk_name[32];\
+ snprintf(clk_name, sizeof(clk_name), "%s#%s", dev_name(port->dev), #name);\
+ clk_name;\
+})
1) This result in some ugly code being inlined
2) You return a pointer a local variable which is not gurantee to exist
anymore outside of this ...
Please do this simply in the related function.
I've overdone it. I'll move it to the meson_uart_probe_clocks function
as you suggested.
+
+static struct clk_div_table xtal_div_table[] = {
+ { 0, 3 },
+ { 1, 1 },
+ { 2, 2 },
+ { 3, 2 },
+};
+
+static int meson_uart_probe_clocks(struct uart_port *port)
{
- struct clk *clk = NULL;
- int ret;
+ struct meson_uart_data *private_data = port->private_data;
+ struct clk *clk_baud, *clk_xtal;
+ struct clk_hw *hw;
+ struct clk_parent_data use_xtal_mux_parents[2] = {
+ { .index = -1, },
+ { .index = -1, },
+ };
- clk = devm_clk_get(dev, id);
- if (IS_ERR(clk))
- return clk;
+ private_data->pclk = devm_clk_get(port->dev, "pclk");
+ if (IS_ERR(private_data->pclk))
+ return dev_err_probe(port->dev, PTR_ERR(private_data->pclk),
+ "Failed to get the 'pclk' clock\n");
- ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(dev, "couldn't enable clk\n");
- return ERR_PTR(ret);
+ clk_baud = devm_clk_get(port->dev, "baud");
+ if (IS_ERR(clk_baud)) {
+ dev_err(port->dev, "Failed to get the 'baud' clock\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(clk_baud);
}
- devm_add_action_or_reset(dev,
- (void(*)(void *))clk_disable_unprepare,
- clk);
-
- return clk;
-}
-
-static int meson_uart_probe_clocks(struct platform_device *pdev,
- struct uart_port *port)
-{
- struct clk *clk_xtal = NULL;
- struct clk *clk_pclk = NULL;
- struct clk *clk_baud = NULL;
-
- clk_pclk = meson_uart_probe_clock(&pdev->dev, "pclk");
- if (IS_ERR(clk_pclk))
- return PTR_ERR(clk_pclk);
-
- clk_xtal = meson_uart_probe_clock(&pdev->dev, "xtal");
+ clk_xtal = devm_clk_get(port->dev, "xtal");
if (IS_ERR(clk_xtal))
- return PTR_ERR(clk_xtal);
-
- clk_baud = meson_uart_probe_clock(&pdev->dev, "baud");
- if (IS_ERR(clk_baud))
- return PTR_ERR(clk_baud);
+ return dev_err_probe(port->dev, PTR_ERR(clk_xtal),
+ "Failed to get the 'xtal' clock\n");
+
+ if (private_data->use_xtal_clk) {
+ hw = devm_clk_hw_register_divider_table(port->dev,
+ CLK_NAME(xtal_div),
+ __clk_get_name(clk_baud),
+ CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT,
+ port->membase + AML_UART_REG5,
+ 26, 2,
+ CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY,
+ xtal_div_table, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(hw))
+ return PTR_ERR(hw);
+
+ use_xtal_mux_parents[1].hw = hw;
+ } else {
+ hw = devm_clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(port->dev,
+ CLK_NAME(clk81_div4),
+ __clk_get_name(clk_baud),
+ CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT,
+ 1, 4);
+ if (IS_ERR(hw))
+ return PTR_ERR(hw);
+
+ use_xtal_mux_parents[0].hw = hw;
+ }
Contradiction with previous series.
In the previous series we could clearly see that gxbb did not have the
/4 divider. It did not have bits 26 and 27 either.
Now gxbb get the /4 divider. It operated correctly without it so far, so
this is rather suspicious. Could you please comment on this ?
As Martin and I discussed earlier.
meson6 and meson8b SoC.There are not have bits 26 and 27 either.
CLK81 is recommended for this part of SOC.
GXL,GXM,GXBB and AXG SOC.The UART_EE_A_REG5[26] is added.
UART_EE_A_REG5[26]:
- 0x0: divide the input clock by 3 (meaning: this internally works
with an 8MHz clock)
- 0x1: use the input clock directly without further division (meaning:
this internally work with an 24MHz clock)
8MHz is recommended for this part of SOC. Their UART IP configuration is
the same.
G12A/B,,SM1,A1 and S4 SOC.The UART_EE_A_REG5[27] is added.
UART_EE_A_REG5[27]:
- 0x0: use the clock as configured in UART_EE_A_REG5[26]
- 0x1: divide the input clock by 2 (meaning: this internally works
with an 12MHz clock)
12MHz is recommended for this part of SOC.
NOTE:
1. clk81 /4 divider.
There is a 4 divider inside, this is what the internal SOC designer told
me. But they forgot to document it. So it makes people feel suspicious.
2.The UART_EE_A_REG5 default value is 0,except for the console port(set
in romcode).All the baud rate clocks supported by UART can work, but
different chip usage scenarios suggest using that clock to reduce jitter.
In summary, I would like to know your suggestions, including how to
change compatible.
Thank you so much!
>>
- port->uartclk = clk_get_rate(clk_baud);
+ hw = __devm_clk_hw_register_mux(port->dev, NULL,
+ CLK_NAME(use_xtal),
+ ARRAY_SIZE(use_xtal_mux_parents),
+ NULL, NULL,
+ use_xtal_mux_parents,
+ CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
+ port->membase + AML_UART_REG5,
+ 24, 0x1,
+ CLK_MUX_READ_ONLY,
+ NULL, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(hw))
+ return PTR_ERR(hw);
+
+ port->uartclk = clk_hw_get_rate(hw);
+
+ hw = devm_clk_hw_register_divider(port->dev,
+ CLK_NAME(baud_div),
+ clk_hw_get_name(hw),
+ CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
+ port->membase + AML_UART_REG5,
+ 0, 23,
+ CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST,
+ NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(hw))
+ return PTR_ERR(hw);
+
+ private_data->baud_clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, "baud_rate");
I have already commented on the use of this function in the previous
version.
Please make sure all comments are addressed before re-posting
I'm sorry. I misunderstood you earlier. I will be changed to
"private_data->baud_clk = hw->clk;".What do you think?
return 0;
}
static int meson_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
+ struct meson_uart_data *private_data;
struct resource *res_mem;
struct uart_port *port;
u32 fifosize = 64; /* Default is 64, 128 for EE UART_0 */
@@ -716,18 +783,20 @@ static int meson_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -EBUSY;
}
- port = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct uart_port), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!port)
+ private_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*private_data),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!private_data)
return -ENOMEM;
+ if (device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev))
+ private_data->use_xtal_clk = true;
+
+ port = &private_data->port;
+
port->membase = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res_mem);
if (IS_ERR(port->membase))
return PTR_ERR(port->membase);
- ret = meson_uart_probe_clocks(pdev, port);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
port->iotype = UPIO_MEM;
port->mapbase = res_mem->start;
port->mapsize = resource_size(res_mem);
@@ -740,7 +809,11 @@ static int meson_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
port->x_char = 0;
port->ops = &meson_uart_ops;
port->fifosize = fifosize;
+ port->private_data = private_data;
port has private_data
private_data has port
Is it really necessary to have both ... looks to me that port in
private_data is overkill
It's very thoughtful of you. I'll delete it as you suggested.
+ ret = meson_uart_probe_clocks(port);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
meson_ports[pdev->id] = port;
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, port);
@@ -766,10 +839,39 @@ static int meson_uart_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
static const struct of_device_id meson_uart_dt_match[] = {
- { .compatible = "amlogic,meson6-uart" },
- { .compatible = "amlogic,meson8-uart" },
- { .compatible = "amlogic,meson8b-uart" },
- { .compatible = "amlogic,meson-gx-uart" },
+ {
+ .compatible = "amlogic,meson6-uart",
+ .data = (void *)false,
+ },
+ {
+ .compatible = "amlogic,meson8-uart",
+ .data = (void *)false,
+ },
+ {
+ .compatible = "amlogic,meson8b-uart",
+ .data = (void *)false,
+ },
+ {
+ .compatible = "amlogic,meson-gxbb-uart",
+ .data = (void *)false,
+ },
+ {
+ .compatible = "amlogic,meson-gxl-uart",
+ .data = (void *)true,
+ },
+ {
+ .compatible = "amlogic,meson-g12a-uart",
+ .data = (void *)true,
+ },
+ /*
+ * deprecated, don't use anymore because it doesn't differentiate
+ * between GXBB, GXL and G12A which have different revisions
+ * of the UART IP.
+ */
+ {
+ .compatible = "amlogic,meson-gx-uart",
+ .data = (void *)false,
+ },
{ /* sentinel */ },
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, meson_uart_dt_match);
