The PL330 was commented out because its binding wasn't converted to a
schema. With the binding converted, the example now needs several updates.
However, while it's possible that the PL330 has a 'cci-control-port', there
aren't any platforms upstream which do. So rather than allowing
'cci-control-port' in the PL330 binding, let's just drop the example.
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,cci-400.yaml | 10 ----------
1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,cci-400.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,cci-400.yaml
index 4682f991a5c8..f8530a50863a 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,cci-400.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,cci-400.yaml
@@ -166,16 +166,6 @@ examples:
};
};
- dma0: dma@3000000 {
- /* compatible = "arm,pl330", "arm,primecell"; */
- cci-control-port = <&cci_control0>;
- reg = <0x0 0x3000000 0x0 0x1000>;
- interrupts = <10>;
- #dma-cells = <1>;
- #dma-channels = <8>;
- #dma-requests = <32>;
- };
-
cci@2c090000 {
compatible = "arm,cci-400";
#address-cells = <1>;
--
2.32.0
