Hi Mark, Lars I'm confusing > > >If we're already specifying the DAI links for the (D)PCM code it seems > > >like we shouldn't also have to put DAPM routes for them in DT as well. > > > Yes, and I think we shouldn't use anything except for datahsheet pin names > > in the devicetree routing, because otherwise we are leaking driver > > implementation details. It came from snd_soc_of_parse_audio_routing() Do you mean this function itself is not good ? > While I agree with the sentiment for this when it comes to DAIs we > probably want to use the name the interfaces get in the documentation > rather than pin names since they involve multiple pins working together. Sorry, but what does your "interfaces get in the documentation" mean ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html