On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:19:01AM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 08/26/2014 11:11 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > >If we're already specifying the DAI links for the (D)PCM code it seems > >like we shouldn't also have to put DAPM routes for them in DT as well. > Yes, and I think we shouldn't use anything except for datahsheet pin names > in the devicetree routing, because otherwise we are leaking driver > implementation details. While I agree with the sentiment for this when it comes to DAIs we probably want to use the name the interfaces get in the documentation rather than pin names since they involve multiple pins working together.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
