On 2021-12-14 18:33, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:16:12 +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
Here's v2, with the DSU binding actually finished (oh the shame...) and
the NVIDIA PMU patch pulled in to benefit from the cleanup and keep
things manageably together. The initial binding patch from v1 is no
longer included since Rob has picked it up separately.
Refactoring arm_pmu's probing to be more modular turns out to be a
substantial yak to shave, so in the end I decided it *is* worth
implementing Mark's macro suggestion now - after all, it can simply be
converted from a function template to a structure template as and when
the time comes.
[...]
Applied first three to will (for-next/perf-cpu), thanks!
[1/5] arm64: perf: Support Denver and Carmel PMUs
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/d4c4844a9b47
[2/5] arm64: perf: Simplify registration boilerplate
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/6ac9f30bd43b
[3/5] arm64: perf: Support new DT compatibles
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/893c34b60a59
Thanks Will! Just to clarify, are you leaving the DSU binding patches
for Rob to pick up, or waiting for the typo to get fixed? (and if the
former - Rob, would you like me to resend a v3 with the typo fixed?)
Cheers,
Robin.