Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] arm64: PMU updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2021-12-14 18:33, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:16:12 +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
Here's v2, with the DSU binding actually finished (oh the shame...) and
the NVIDIA PMU patch pulled in to benefit from the cleanup and keep
things manageably together. The initial binding patch from v1 is no
longer included since Rob has picked it up separately.

Refactoring arm_pmu's probing to be more modular turns out to be a
substantial yak to shave, so in the end I decided it *is* worth
implementing Mark's macro suggestion now - after all, it can simply be
converted from a function template to a structure template as and when
the time comes.

[...]

Applied first three to will (for-next/perf-cpu), thanks!

[1/5] arm64: perf: Support Denver and Carmel PMUs
       https://git.kernel.org/will/c/d4c4844a9b47
[2/5] arm64: perf: Simplify registration boilerplate
       https://git.kernel.org/will/c/6ac9f30bd43b
[3/5] arm64: perf: Support new DT compatibles
       https://git.kernel.org/will/c/893c34b60a59

Thanks Will! Just to clarify, are you leaving the DSU binding patches for Rob to pick up, or waiting for the typo to get fixed? (and if the former - Rob, would you like me to resend a v3 with the typo fixed?)

Cheers,
Robin.



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux