On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:16:12 +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Here's v2, with the DSU binding actually finished (oh the shame...) and
> the NVIDIA PMU patch pulled in to benefit from the cleanup and keep
> things manageably together. The initial binding patch from v1 is no
> longer included since Rob has picked it up separately.
>
> Refactoring arm_pmu's probing to be more modular turns out to be a
> substantial yak to shave, so in the end I decided it *is* worth
> implementing Mark's macro suggestion now - after all, it can simply be
> converted from a function template to a structure template as and when
> the time comes.
>
> [...]
Applied first three to will (for-next/perf-cpu), thanks!
[1/5] arm64: perf: Support Denver and Carmel PMUs
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/d4c4844a9b47
[2/5] arm64: perf: Simplify registration boilerplate
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/6ac9f30bd43b
[3/5] arm64: perf: Support new DT compatibles
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/893c34b60a59
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
