On 21-11-18 19:04:04, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 07:46:55PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > > Add i.MX8DXL lpuart compatible to the bindings documentation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml > > index dc1f0e07cbd4..fa8a602ccb22 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml > > @@ -27,6 +27,10 @@ properties: > > - items: > > - const: fsl,imx8qm-lpuart > > - const: fsl,imx8qxp-lpuart > > + - items: > > + - const: fsl,imx8dxl-lpuart > > + - const: fsl,imx8qxp-lpuart > > + - const: fsl,imx7ulp-lpuart > > I'm confused why 8dxl is compatible with 7ulp, but 8qm is not? From the > driver, it looks like the difference is clocks. > There are still things to be upstreamed for the fsl-lpuart driver. Looking at the NXP's tree, 7ulp has some specific fixup that the 8qm doesn't need. Have a look here: https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imx/linux-imx/tree/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c?h=lf-5.10.y#n3242 > > > > reg: > > maxItems: 1 > > -- > > 2.31.1 > > > >
