On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 3:59 PM Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 18.11.2021 14:52, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > DT is not the only one, > > > > So, I would like to see some kind of roadmap / vision on how this can > > be useful in the ACPI case. > > Unfortunately I don't do any ACPI development and I also have zero ACPI > experience. I'm not sure how to proceed with this. Does ACPI have some > tables that get translated into DT-like form? Can I emulate that and > test somehow? > > Anyone else willing to help on the ACPI part? As I elaborated in the subthread of patch 3 you don't need to care about ACPI _implementation_, only about _design_ that will give no obstacles to have the ACPI part be implemented. I may do it in case somebody prepares internal APIs and data structures for the interaction with FW (descriptions). That said, you don't need to know the ACPI details at all. Ask questions in case you are in doubt, I would be happy to help. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
