On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 3:22 PM Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx> > > A week ago I sent > [PATCH RFC] dt-bindings: pinctrl: support specifying pins > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20211110231436.8866-1-zajec5@xxxxxxxxx/ > > From short discussion in that thread it seems that using DT to store > pinctrl pins, groups & functions may be an option. I'd like to ask for > reviewing my patchset implementing that. > > Please note it's about describing hardware elements and not actual > programming way. It may be used with pinctrl-single.c one day but it's > designed as a generic solution for data. > > Patches 1-4 are for linux-pinctrl.git. Patch 5 I found worth including > as DT big example. It can go through Linus with Florian's Ack or I can > send it to Florian later. DT is not the only one, So, I would like to see some kind of roadmap / vision on how this can be useful in the ACPI case. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko