The 11/08/2021 08:35, Codrin Ciubotariu - M19940 wrote: > On 05.11.2021 23:47, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > >> I think actually I will drop this patch series because apparently > >> lan966x works fine also with the peripheral clock. So then no changes > >> are required. > > > > Not even patch 1/2? > > > > we can keep the new compatible, but patch 2/2 needs to be split. For me it is OK to use the compatible string 'microchip,sam9x60-i2c' > > Best regards, > Codrin -- /Horatiu
