On 12.10.2021 17:07, Horatiu Vultur wrote: > Add support to be able to set BRSRCCLK. This feature is support on lan966x > > Horatiu Vultur (2): > dt-bindings: i2c: at91: Extend compatible list for lan966x > i2c: at91: add support for brsrcclk > > .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-at91.txt | 6 +++-- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91-core.c | 16 +++++++++++++ > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91-master.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++-- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.h | 1 + > 4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > Hi Horatiu, From what I understand, on your DTS, you replaced the peripheral clock with the GCLK in the I2C node. This means that you are forcing all the variants that support clk_brsrcclk to treat the current clock as GCLK. This is not necessarily correct, since this newer variants can also work fine with only the peripheral clock and we should keep these option available. I would add an optional GCLK clock binding in the I2C node. This way GCLK will be used only if it is present in DT and clk_brsrcclk set. Best regards, Codrin
