On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 23:13:46 +0500, Nikita Travkin wrote: > From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > > This converts the Zinitix BT4xx and BT5xx touchscreen bindings to YAML, fix > them up a bit and extends them. > > We list all the existing BT4xx and BT5xx components with compatible strings. > These are all similar, use the same bindings and work in similar ways. > > We rename the supplies from the erroneous vdd/vddo to the actual supply > names vcca/vdd as specified on the actual component. It is long established > that supplies shall be named after the supply pin names of a component. > The confusion probably stems from that in a certain product the rails to the > component were named vdd/vddo. Drop some notes on how OS implementations should > avoid confusion by first looking for vddo, and if that exists assume the > legacy binding pair and otherwise use vcca/vdd. > > Add reset-gpios as sometimes manufacturers pulls a GPIO line to the reset > line on the chip. > > Add optional touchscreen-fuzz-x and touchscreen-fuzz-y properties. > > Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Michael Srba <Michael.Srba@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: phone-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > [Fixed dt_schema_check error] > Signed-off-by: Nikita Travkin <nikita@xxxxxxx> > --- > This patch was previously submited here: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/20210625113435.2539282-1-linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > Changes since the original patch: > - Use enum for compatible list instead of oneOf + const > --- > .../input/touchscreen/zinitix,bt400.yaml | 115 ++++++++++++++++++ > .../bindings/input/touchscreen/zinitix.txt | 40 ------ > 2 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/zinitix,bt400.yaml > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/zinitix.txt > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
